Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lina Gjorcheska vs Madelief Hageman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gjorcheska vs Hageman analysis and find out who is favored!
Lina Gjorcheska vs Madelief Hageman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gjorcheska 1 - 0 Hageman
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gjorcheska has won 35.57% of points on their second serve, while Hageman has won 48.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gjorcheska, in recent form, has won 58.08% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hageman has won 57.58%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.31% and 41.59% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gjorcheska has saved 56.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hageman has saved 48.02% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gjorcheska has won 62.07% of matches played (W/L 36/ 22), with Hageman winning 51.52% (W/L 34/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gjorcheska has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 351/ 178), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Hageman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 92/ 84), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Gjorcheska has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.29% of matches (W/L 36/ 20), where as Hageman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.36% of matches (W/L 31/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gjorcheska winning 1 times and Hageman being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gjorcheska winning 2 and Hageman winning 0. The last match between Gjorcheska and Hageman was at the W35 Antalya, 06-02-2024, First, Clay with Lina Gjorcheska getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gjorcheska and Hageman have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gjorcheska winning 0 times and Hageman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gjorcheska winning 0, and Hageman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gjorcheska has played against opponents with an average rank of 323.48 while Hageman has played against players with an average rank of 126.59.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gjorcheska has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hageman has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gjorcheska has converted 53.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hageman has converted 45.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
229
Rank
170
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
64% (439-245)
Career Total W/L
52% (96-90)
54% (14-12)
YTD W/L
62% (21-13)
$33,613
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Lina Gjorcheska vs Madelief Hageman For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gjorcheska VS Hageman
Sportsbook
Offer
Gjorcheska VS Hageman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Lina Gjorcheska | Madelief Hageman |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:0 | 1:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (28/44) | 63% (32/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (20/28) | 47% (15/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (9/16) | 32% (6/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 59% (30/51) | 34% (15/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Gjorcheska VS Hageman H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Lina Gjorcheska
Player
Madelief Hageman
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lina Gjorcheska | Madelief Hageman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (14/12) | 62% (21/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (32/28) | 59% (49/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (273/262) | 55% (420/350) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (13/10) | 63% (20/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.07 |
| Aces Total | 48 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.71 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 186 | 58 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:35 | 1:27:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 342.73 | 132.82 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1198/1839) | 63% (1143/1804) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (756/1198) | 58% (659/1143) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 36% (228/641) | 49% (324/661) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (118/222) | 46% (110/240) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (831/1731) | 47% (851/1823) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (14/10) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (19/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (14/25) | 62% (21/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 33% (2/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 53% (8/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 81% (21/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 19% (21/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 31% (13/4) |
Lina Gjorcheska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Lina Gjorcheska
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-0 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lina Gjorcheska
Player
Michaela Bayerlova
70%
(
68 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
7
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
1
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
21%
(
6 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Lina Gjorcheska
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
6 of
39)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
47%
(
43 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
54 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Lina Gjorcheska
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lina Gjorcheska
Player
Mai Hontama
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
48%
(
46 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lina Gjorcheska
Player
Polina Kudermetova
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
4
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
32 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Lina Gjorcheska
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
10
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lina Gjorcheska
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
6
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
22%
(
5 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
51 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deborah Chiesa
Player
Lina Gjorcheska
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
1
Aces
4
-
Double Faults
-
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lina Gjorcheska
Player
Anca Alexia Todoni
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Madelief Hageman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Madelief Hageman
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Ekaterina Ovcharenko
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
55)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Andreea Prisacariu
Player
Madelief Hageman
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
49%
(
33 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Suana Tucakovic
67%
(
72 of
107)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
99)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
51 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(7) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Mana Kawamura
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
44%
(
20 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
82%
(
27 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
6-0 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 0-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 4-6 6-2 13-11 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Carmen Andreea Herea
Player
Madelief Hageman
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Dimitra Pavlou
73%
(
82 of
113)
1st Serve %
67%
(
76 of
113)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
45 of
76)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
48 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gjorcheska Vs Hageman Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gjorcheska are available here and Hageman photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
